Ratti Gali Lake

19 thoughts on “Ratti Gali Lake”

1. 

   archeologiagalliacisalpina

   September 20, 2025 at 23:23

   Che meraviglia !!!!

   Reply
2. 

   william sinclair manson (Billy.)

   September 21, 2025 at 00:51

   thats beautiful.

   Reply
3. 

   Ezekiel Fish

   September 21, 2025 at 05:23

   Beautiful scenery.

   Reply
4. 

   🖊 ⚠️ ALERT: You received 1.2 bitcoin! Tap to claim > https://graph.org/Get-your-BTC-09-04?hs=42382cafc62c558a0a88c9ddfd82ce24& 🖊

   September 21, 2025 at 05:45

   ea5vjv

   Reply
5. 

   mosckerr

   September 21, 2025 at 11:44

   A clear example how the Rambam Yad avoda zara worshipped Islam’s false notion of some Universal ONE God Monotheism nonsense.

   The 10 plagues judged the Gods of Egypt. Elijah confronted the priests who worshipped Baal! The notion that the Torah commands monotheism confuses Islam with Torah. Flat out just that simple. The Talmud states that the Goyim rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Goyim do not worship their own Gods? Of course Goyim worship their own Gods. Since Goyim do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, therefore Goyim by definition worship other Gods.

   Many societies have their own deities and religious systems, which can be seen as a form of polytheism. Hinduism clearly proves that Islamic monotheism – false. The seven mitzvot bnai Noach refers to gere toshav temporary residents living within the borders of Judea. It does not teach the absurd notion of some Universal God. Islam teaches this avoda zarah.

   For a ger toshav to violate one of the 7 mitzvot – this qualifies as a Capital Crime/death penalty offence. Only a Sanhedrin court could judicate a Capital Crime/death penalty case. The jurisdiction of all Sanhedrin courts, only within the borders of Judea. Hence the absurd notion that the 7 mitzvot Bnai Noach applies Universally to all Goyim, simply pie in the sky bat shit crazy.

   The Torah in the Book of D’varim defines two types of Goyim; the ger toshav in mesechta Sanhedrin and the Nacree/Canaani in Baba Kama. Concerning treif meat the Book of D’varim writes: permitted to give the treif meat to the ger toshav or sell the treif meat to the Canaani. The Talmud defines the Chumash. It does not rule independent from the Written Torah Constitutional Mandate.

   Mesechta Sanhedrin whose Aggada addresses the 7 mitzvot bnai noach therefore refers to the ger toshav of the Torah. Mesechta Baba Kama whose Halacha rules that an Israel exempt to pay damages to a Nacree for damages inflicted upon his goods or person – this mesechta refers to Canaani in the Book of D’varim. Therefore the idea that Ger Toshav/Bnai Noach refers to all Goyim in all lands, utterly absurd.

   Therefore its patently false for anyone, especially Goyim or even later Jews, to declare that Torah commands belief in a Universal God when the Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai and that both Yishmael and Esau rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. That Goyim living in Goyim lands – if they profane the 7 mitzvot bnai noach – that a non existent Sanhedrin can put them to death for violating these 7 mitzvot while these Goyim live under the court authority of their own nations! Therefore Torah does not command monotheism. Monotheism profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.

   Reply
6. 

   william sinclair manson (Billy.)

   September 21, 2025 at 19:15

   gorgeous scenery.

   Reply
7. 

   Psychologistmimi

   September 21, 2025 at 19:45

   It seems to be very beautiful. Cheers.

   Reply
8. 

   mosckerr

   September 21, 2025 at 19:52

   קידושין

   Vector bearing azimuths in both T’NaCH and Talmud to make inductive logic case/rule comparison between similar judicial cases.  Prophets, they serve as the shotrim of the Shoftim of the Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms.  These prophetic shotrim serve as the enforcers of Sanhedrin court judicial rulings.  Prophets do not exist separate or divorced from serving as shotrim police enforcers of Sanhedrin common law judicial rulings.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.

   דתני האיש מקדש.  מה שדה מקניא בחליפין אף אשה נמי מקניא
   Legal mechanisms of acquisition (kinyan), an abstract idea rather than a physical acquisition. The act of acquisition entails the husband acquiring title to the Name of the future born children which this marital union will ideally produce. Hence the symbolic “exchange” involves not the woman herself but rather the acquisition of the unborn children born into the future or O’lam Ha’bah of this marital union.

   The depth of the legal and symbolic meanings behind kinyan-acquistitions in the context of marriage, basically a Man cannot love that which he does not own.  The basic standard Torah definition for “Love” as a secondary Torah precedent commandment.  It illustrates that marital  acquisition – rejects treating the woman as property.  But rather about establishing a framework for family, legacy, and spiritual continuity of the oath brit-chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

   Our Gemara now makes a study of T’NaCH kabbalah prophetic mussar sources which shall in their turn require making bearing azimuth precedent comparison similar cases.  Its this wisdom of Torah scholarship which ties Talmudic common law with T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law. 

   Upon this chief cornerstone common law sh’itta of Torah scholarship all generations have “this” obligation from their fathers to learn.  A man acquires his wife in the name of producing children and educating those future born children in the faith to righteously pursue judicial justice among our Cohen people.

   The first precedent   דברים כד:א: “כי יקח איש אשה”, this פרט resides within the sugya כלל of כד:א – ד. This sugya linked to the three earlier sugyot כג:כב-כד וכג:כה. וכג:כו. The subject matter of these three small sugyot vows, respect of a neighbors property and goods as does likewise the next single p’suk sugya. Our p’suk כד:א addresses כי מצא בה ערות דבר וכתב לא ספר כריתת. The דיוק made from this pasuk, just as get defined as a mitzva from the Torah so too קידושין a mitzva from the Torah. The acquisition of קידושין once profaned through a divorce cannot thereafter be acquired again. Just as a korban, once dedicated for a Shoah offering, this korban cannot later be substituted for some other korban dedication, such as an asham dedication. Once a man acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah soul of his wife, even God himself cannot intervene and father a child from this woman! A distinctly unique idea which the Greek God Zeus did when he fathered Hercules from a married woman.

   In Greek & New Testament mythology, divine intervention often disrupts human relationships and moral boundaries. Jewish judicial common law emphasizes the sanctity of marriage and the importance of fidelity.  The notion that a husband acquires the soul of his wife and that this bond protected by a Torah oath alliance, reflects the seriousness with which Jewish law treats marriage. קידושין emphasizes the importance of fidelity, commitment, and the spiritual dimensions of the marital relationship visa-vis tohor time-oriented commandments which continuously create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

   This Torah wisdom reinforces the values of respect and responsibility within the context of family and community.  The pasuk בראשית כג:יז located within the larger sugya of בראשית כג:א-כ.  Sarah did not survive the horrors of the Akedah, where Yitzak swore an oath brit that if HaShem would save the chosen Cohen seed from shoah, that he dedicates the O’lam Ha’bah life of his future born seed to do Torah mitzvot as the defining cultural trait of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

   Avraham refers to himself as a גר תושב person of status.  Interesting any גר תושב accepts, while living inside the borders of Judea, to keep the 7 mitzvot bnai noach.  Why?  Observance of commandments, specifically גרי תושב commandments as defined in Masechet Sanhedrin, referred thereafter as the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach, this temporary Torah obligation permits the גר תושב to sue an Israel for damages in a Jewish court of law.  By contrast the Nacree/Canaani, as defined in masechet Baba Kama, did not enjoy the judicial legal protections enjoyed by the ger toshav.

   Therefore our Av Mishna likewise comes to distinguish and define the rights of women in Torah common law.  A ordinary woman does not possess the legal right to acquire a Man, except and unless she qualifies as a significant status, such as being a tribal chief.  For example: the prophetess Devorah as a sho’ter The concept of judicial authority existed during the time of Deborah.  Both Moshe and Yehoshua established the 6 cities of refuge with their Small Sanhedrin courtrooms.  

   Deborah served as a judge and prophetess in Israel, leading her people during a time of oppression. The Aggadic story found in the Book of שופטים (פרק ד וה), which depicts her as a leader who inspired Barak to lead the Israelites against the Canaanite army.  Prophets forever and always serve as the shot’rim of the sanhedrin common law courtrooms.  This fundamental נפקא מינא both the fraudulent counterfeit books NT and Koran failed to discern.

   Abraham’s acquisition of the Cave wherein he buried Sarah compares to the mitzva of קידושין, ideally both sets of acquisitions shall permanently maintain this status.  The status of a married woman, higher than the status of a virgin unmarried woman.  The NT virgin Mary theology perverts this Torah priority all together into a foreign alien Av tuma avoda zarah religion.

   The pasuk ירמיה לב:כה contained inside the larger sugya כלל:  לב:טז-כה.  The comparison of Avraham as a גר תושב to the people of Canaan compares to Israel invaded by the Armies of Babylon.  Avraham demanded to pay the full price for Sarah’s burial plot due to his outright distrust of the faithfulness of the nations of Canaan.  Israel to in the days of Yirmeyahu failed to rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial justice.  Its judges accepted bribes and perverted law.

   T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar.  This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings.  A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז.  The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut.  Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.

   T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar.  This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings.  A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז.  The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut.  Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.

   תני האשה נקנית וניתני התם האיש קונה.  מעיקא תני לישנא דאורייתא ולבסוף תני לישנא דרבנן.  ומאי לישנא דרבנן דאמר לה אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש וניתני הכא דאיש קינה משום דקא בעי למיתנא סיפא וקונה את אצמה

   What does the language אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש? This refers to the oath brit sworn between the pieces wherein HaShem cut a brit with Avram that his future born Cohen seed would number the stars in the heavens for multitude. Torah common law always learns by means of prior precedent rulings. Any attempt to read the Talmud, as if it existed as a common book of pleasurable reading, like fiction – utterly false. The Talmud stands upon the mandate of the Torah as the working Constitution of the Republic. Upon this יסוד both the T’NaCH and Talmud stand. Just as the mitzva of קידושין represents a permanent status so too and how much more so the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic stands as a permanent status. The transformation of קידושין as a rabbinic commandment likewise changed the status of the Torah away from a Constitutional basic law document unto a religious law of ritual observances as codified in the Shulkan Aruch. The one bears no resemblance to the other any more than a bastard child born from adultery, resembles the profaned husband’s relationship with his wife.

   Reply
9. 

   mosckerr

   September 21, 2025 at 20:00

   קידושין

   Vector bearing azimuths in both T’NaCH and Talmud to make inductive logic case/rule comparison between similar judicial cases.  Prophets, they serve as the shotrim of the Shoftim of the Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms.  These prophetic shotrim serve as the enforcers of Sanhedrin court judicial rulings.  Prophets do not exist separate or divorced from serving as shotrim police enforcers of Sanhedrin common law judicial rulings.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.

   דתני האיש מקדש.  מה שדה מקניא בחליפין אף אשה נמי מקניא
   Legal mechanisms of acquisition (kinyan), an abstract idea rather than a physical acquisition. The act of acquisition entails the husband acquiring title to the Name of the future born children which this marital union will ideally produce. Hence the symbolic “exchange” involves not the woman herself but rather the acquisition of the unborn children born into the future or O’lam Ha’bah of this marital union.

   The depth of the legal and symbolic meanings behind kinyan-acquistitions in the context of marriage, basically a Man cannot love that which he does not own.  The basic standard Torah definition for “Love” as a secondary Torah precedent commandment.  It illustrates that marital  acquisition – rejects treating the woman as property.  But rather about establishing a framework for family, legacy, and spiritual continuity of the oath brit-chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

   Our Gemara now makes a study of T’NaCH kabbalah prophetic mussar sources which shall in their turn require making bearing azimuth precedent comparison similar cases.  Its this wisdom of Torah scholarship which ties Talmudic common law with T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law. 

   Upon this chief cornerstone common law sh’itta of Torah scholarship all generations have “this” obligation from their fathers to learn.  A man acquires his wife in the name of producing children and educating those future born children in the faith to righteously pursue judicial justice among our Cohen people.

   The first precedent   דברים כד:א: “כי יקח איש אשה”, this פרט resides within the sugya כלל of כד:א – ד. This sugya linked to the three earlier sugyot כג:כב-כד וכג:כה. וכג:כו. The subject matter of these three small sugyot vows, respect of a neighbors property and goods as does likewise the next single p’suk sugya. Our p’suk כד:א addresses כי מצא בה ערות דבר וכתב לא ספר כריתת. The דיוק made from this pasuk, just as get defined as a mitzva from the Torah so too קידושין a mitzva from the Torah. The acquisition of קידושין once profaned through a divorce cannot thereafter be acquired again. Just as a korban, once dedicated for a Shoah offering, this korban cannot later be substituted for some other korban dedication, such as an asham dedication. Once a man acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah soul of his wife, even God himself cannot intervene and father a child from this woman! A distinctly unique idea which the Greek God Zeus did when he fathered Hercules from a married woman.

   In Greek & New Testament mythology, divine intervention often disrupts human relationships and moral boundaries. Jewish judicial common law emphasizes the sanctity of marriage and the importance of fidelity.  The notion that a husband acquires the soul of his wife and that this bond protected by a Torah oath alliance, reflects the seriousness with which Jewish law treats marriage. קידושין emphasizes the importance of fidelity, commitment, and the spiritual dimensions of the marital relationship visa-vis tohor time-oriented commandments which continuously create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

   This Torah wisdom reinforces the values of respect and responsibility within the context of family and community.  The pasuk בראשית כג:יז located within the larger sugya of בראשית כג:א-כ.  Sarah did not survive the horrors of the Akedah, where Yitzak swore an oath brit that if HaShem would save the chosen Cohen seed from shoah, that he dedicates the O’lam Ha’bah life of his future born seed to do Torah mitzvot as the defining cultural trait of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

   Avraham refers to himself as a גר תושב person of status.  Interesting any גר תושב accepts, while living inside the borders of Judea, to keep the 7 mitzvot bnai noach.  Why?  Observance of commandments, specifically גרי תושב commandments as defined in Masechet Sanhedrin, referred thereafter as the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach, this temporary Torah obligation permits the גר תושב to sue an Israel for damages in a Jewish court of law.  By contrast the Nacree/Canaani, as defined in masechet Baba Kama, did not enjoy the judicial legal protections enjoyed by the ger toshav.

   Therefore our Av Mishna likewise comes to distinguish and define the rights of women in Torah common law.  A ordinary woman does not possess the legal right to acquire a Man, except and unless she qualifies as a significant status, such as being a tribal chief.  For example: the prophetess Devorah as a sho’ter The concept of judicial authority existed during the time of Deborah.  Both Moshe and Yehoshua established the 6 cities of refuge with their Small Sanhedrin courtrooms.  

   Deborah served as a judge and prophetess in Israel, leading her people during a time of oppression. The Aggadic story found in the Book of שופטים (פרק ד וה), which depicts her as a leader who inspired Barak to lead the Israelites against the Canaanite army.  Prophets forever and always serve as the shot’rim of the sanhedrin common law courtrooms.  This fundamental נפקא מינא both the fraudulent counterfeit books NT and Koran failed to discern.

   Abraham’s acquisition of the Cave wherein he buried Sarah compares to the mitzva of קידושין, ideally both sets of acquisitions shall permanently maintain this status.  The status of a married woman, higher than the status of a virgin unmarried woman.  The NT virgin Mary theology perverts this Torah priority all together into a foreign alien Av tuma avoda zarah religion.

   The pasuk ירמיה לב:כה contained inside the larger sugya כלל:  לב:טז-כה.  The comparison of Avraham as a גר תושב to the people of Canaan compares to Israel invaded by the Armies of Babylon.  Avraham demanded to pay the full price for Sarah’s burial plot due to his outright distrust of the faithfulness of the nations of Canaan.  Israel to in the days of Yirmeyahu failed to rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial justice.  Its judges accepted bribes and perverted law.

   T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar.  This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings.  A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז.  The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut.  Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.

   T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar.  This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings.  A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז.  The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut.  Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.

   תני האשה נקנית וניתני התם האיש קונה.  מעיקא תני לישנא דאורייתא ולבסוף תני לישנא דרבנן.  ומאי לישנא דרבנן דאמר לה אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש וניתני הכא דאיש קינה משום דקא בעי למיתנא סיפא וקונה את אצמה

   What does the language אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש? This refers to the oath brit sworn between the pieces wherein HaShem cut a brit with Avram that his future born Cohen seed would number the stars in the heavens for multitude. Torah common law always learns by means of prior precedent rulings. Any attempt to read the Talmud, as if it existed as a common book of pleasurable reading, like fiction – utterly false. The Talmud stands upon the mandate of the Torah as the working Constitution of the Republic. Upon this יסוד both the T’NaCH and Talmud stand. Just as the mitzva of קידושין represents a permanent status so too and how much more so the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic stands as a permanent status. The transformation of קידושין as a rabbinic commandment likewise changed the status of the Torah away from a Constitutional basic law document unto a religious law of ritual observances as codified in the Shulkan Aruch. The one bears no resemblance to the other any more than a bastard child born from adultery, resembles the profaned husband’s relationship with his wife.

   Reply
10. 

    999jili

    September 22, 2025 at 22:12

    Smart bankroll management is key – seeing platforms like 999jili club emphasize security & strategic play is a good sign. Setting limits, as they suggest, can really help maintain composure & avoid chasing losses. It’s about informed fun!

    Reply
11. 

    999jili

    September 22, 2025 at 22:13

    That’s a great point about strategic gameplay! Setting limits & secure accounts, like with a 999jili link, really boosts confidence. Exploring different game categories is key to finding your edge! 👍

    Reply
12. 

    Kerri Elizabeth

    September 22, 2025 at 22:40

    Wow 😮 looks like fall colors and change of season ahead.. absolutely beautiful!

    Reply
13. 

    veerites

    September 23, 2025 at 16:55

    Dear Martha
    Your posts are always inspiring!
    Thanks for liking my post, ‘Surgeries’ ❤️🌹

    Reply
14. 

    Life Vibes ♥️Real Neel

    September 23, 2025 at 23:14

    Nice which place this

    Reply
15. 

    Di

    September 25, 2025 at 17:08

    That is so beautiful.

    Reply
16. 

    Cecilia kariuki

    September 29, 2025 at 12:08

    Beautiful photos

    Reply
17. 

    Susan Babbitt

    October 20, 2025 at 11:23

    Impressive photos! And thank you for liking my post.

    Reply
18. 

    marthaisla8@gmail.com

    October 23, 2025 at 15:20

    That’s great

    Reply
19. 

    Créer un compte gratuit

    February 3, 2026 at 16:00

    Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.

    Reply